Skip to main content
TypePremium Audit · Extended
Audit IDAUDIT-260512-SHOPDEMO
GeneratedMay 12, 2026
ACCESSIBILITY REPORT FOR

shop.example

https://shop.example12 pages scanned

Automated scan complete. Below: your score, where you stand against industry benchmarks, the priority fix to ship this week, and full code-level remediation for all 22 findings — resolved via 4 code-level patterns — including element screenshots, business impact estimates, and a phased remediation roadmap. Your VPAT 2.5 is one click away.

Lawsuit Risk
$25k – $100k
Avg US lawsuit settlement
Industry Average
41 / 100
E-commerce · you're 9 pt below
Est. Remediation
9 – 12 hrs
~$2.3k – $4.8k dev cost
32
out of 100
HIGH RISK

Critical accessibility barriers detected. Your storefront likely violates WCAG 2.2 AA and is exposed to ADA Title III litigation.

Blocker
4
22 fixes · 100%
Critical
6
Blocks core users
Serious
13
Major barriers
Moderate
3
Noticeable friction
Minor
0
Polish & consistency
Total
22
All issues found
01 · Executive Summary

What this means for your business

Plain-language briefing for stakeholders. No WCAG jargon — just what's at stake and what to do first.

shop.example has significant accessibility barriers affecting blind, low-vision, and keyboard-only visitors and is at risk under ADA Title III. Across 12 pages audited, shop.example returned 22 findings — 6 critical, 13 serious, and 3 moderate — with a score of 32 out of 100. The most frequent issues are 8 color-contrast failures, 6 unlabeled buttons, 5 unlabeled links, and 3 missing image alternatives. These four patterns alone account for all 22 findings and represent fundamental barriers to navigation and product discovery.

Unlabeled buttons and links directly block screen-reader and voice-control users from completing transactions on your storefront. Color-contrast failures affect visitors with low vision or color blindness — estimated at 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women globally. E-commerce sites with this severity profile are frequently cited in ADA Title III demand letters and litigation, which have been increasing year over year.

Start with the 6 unlabeled buttons and 5 unlabeled links — these are fast, high-impact fixes that immediately unblock assistive technology users and reduce legal exposure. Resolving the 8 contrast failures comes next and will also improve readability for all visitors. Just 4 code-level patterns will resolve all 22 findings.

Generated by AI based on your audit data · Claude Sonnet 4.6 · May 12, 2026

02 · Executive Dashboard

Your accessibility at a glance

Severity breakdown of every finding and the visitor groups they affect — stakeholder-relevant signals on one page.

Direct Barriers
86%
19 of 22 findings actively prevent users from completing tasks on your site.
Affected Visitors
~15%
Across screen reader, low vision, keyboard, and voice users — roughly 1 in 7 of your traffic.
Fix Patterns
4
Just 4 code-level patterns resolve 22 of 22 findings. Most leverage you'll get from any audit.
By Severity 22 findings total
Critical
6
Serious
13
Moderate
3
Minor
0
By User Groupfindings affecting each
Screen reader
14
Low vision
16
Keyboard only
0
Voice control
0
03 · Priority Fixes

Where to start

Three WCAG patterns explain most findings. The most urgent on the left, the rest on the right.

Critical/checkout
Submit button has no accessible name
WCAG 4.1.2Est. 30 min fix
Current code · Fails WCAG
<button type="submit" class="submit-order">
  <svg class="icon-cart">...</svg>
</button>
Recommended fix
<button type="submit" class="submit-order"
        aria-label="Place order">
  <svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg>
</button>
04 · Industry Benchmark

You score below the median

Distribution of WCAG 2.2 AA scores across ~124k sites in E-commerce. Source: WebAIM Million 2024.

Category
E-commerce
MEDIAN 38YOU · 32780255075100
BOTTOM 25%
BELOW MEDIAN
ABOVE MEDIAN
TOP 25%
32vs. median38
6-point gap to industry median. 68% of sites in your category score higher than you. Closing the gap is a measurable, finite engineering project.
Projection after Priority Fixes
32 → 78
Resolving your top fix patterns lifts you above the median in one sprint.
05 · From audit to ship

Pick your path

Three steps from audit to fixed. Compare options, see your savings, configure your scope.

1
Compare paths
What does this cost you?
Do nothing
$25k – $100k+
If ADA Title III lawsuit · 6–18 months
DIY in-house
$4.5k – $12k
60–100h dev time · 4–6 weeks
Accessive team
$999 – $1,499
Standard or Express · scoped below
2
Your ROI
You save $3.5k – $11k choosing Accessive.
$3.5k+ saved vs. in-house dev time · 22 findings in scope. Includes 1× free re-scan within 90 days.
3
Configure & buy
Issues we'll fix
6 Critical
13 Serious
3 Moderate
0 Minor
⚡ FASTEST
EXPRESS · 48H
$1,499
Same engineers · Re-scan included
💰 BEST VALUE
STANDARD · 2–3 WK
$999
Same engineers · Re-scan included
FULL COMPLIANCE
MANUAL AUDIT
$1,800
12 pages · $1,500 base (10 incl.) + 2 × $150
Hand-driven · Attorney-reviewable
Try with your audit →
Q3 2026
MONITORING
From $49/mo
Daily re-scans · Slack alerts
Notify me →
06 · Where issues live

Find, fix, verify — page by page

22 elements across 13 pages. Click a page below to drill in, or scan the cards directly.

Showing 1–6 of 13 pages
07 · Framework conformance

Conformance by framework

Every accessibility law builds on the same technical standard — WCAG. Your audit measures WCAG conformance, then maps it to each law that references it. Final compliance determination requires manual testing and legal counsel.

Foundation5 automated failures found

WCAG 2.2 AA

International · W3C standard

This is the technical foundation. Every law below references WCAG — your conformance here flows down into all four.

42
Passed
5
Failed
2
Manual
W3C standard
PDF

ADA Title III

US Federal · WCAG 2.1 AA
50 criteria
5 automated failures found
Fix these to reach a clean audit
41
Passed (automated)
5
Failed
3
Need manual review
Lawsuit risk
PDF

EAA

EU · EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA
50 criteria
5 automated failures found
Fix these to reach a clean audit
41
Passed (automated)
5
Failed
3
Need manual review
EU Market Access
PDF

Section 508

US Federal · WCAG 2.0 AA
38 criteria
4 automated failures found
Fix these to reach a clean audit
31
Passed (automated)
4
Failed
2
Need manual review
Procurement requirement
PDF

AODA

Ontario · WCAG 2.0 AA
38 criteria
4 automated failures found
Fix these to reach a clean audit
31
Passed (automated)
4
Failed
2
Need manual review
Ontario regulation
PDF
08 · Audit methodology

How we found these issues

Automated WCAG 2.2 AA scans across every page, enriched with AI-generated remediation guidance for each finding. Manual verification with assistive technology is available as a separate service.

automated

axe-core baseline

axe-core 4.xWCAG 2.2 AAevery page

Industry-standard axe-core engine scans every page in your audit. Catches contrast, alt text, ARIA, and document structure issues — the ~30-40% of WCAG criteria that automation reliably detects.

ai-powered

AI remediation guidance

Claude Sonnet 4.6code examplestest steps

Each finding is enriched with plain-English explanations, concrete code fixes, affected user groups, and verification steps — so your team knows exactly what to fix and how to verify.

traceable

Per-finding evidence

WCAG 2.2selectorsbefore/after code

Every finding maps to a specific WCAG success criterion with the exact element selector, current code, and recommended fix. Full audit trail for your remediation team.

For court-defensible compliance verification, see Manual Audit + signed VPAT 2.5 (separate service).

09 · VPAT 2.5 · Accessibility Conformance Report

Procurement-ready documentation

VPAT 2.5 (Accessibility Conformance Report) generation is coming soon as a separate Pro tier. Required by US federal procurement and large enterprise vendor reviews. Contact sales for early access.

Add-on

Procurement-ready VPAT 2.5

A pre-filled VPAT 2.5 template generated from your audit findings. Hand it to procurement, attach to RFPs, or share with customers asking for an ACR. VPAT 2.5 — available as add-on from $199.

Notify me when available
10 · Takeaways

Take this report with you

Download the executive summary or share the full audit with your team and stakeholders.

Share with your team

Anyone with the link can view this free summary for shop.example.

Anyone with the link can view this report.

Download as PDF

Take this summary with you for your records.

PDFWCAG 2.2 AA

Your full premium audit · PDF

Monitor monthly

Auto-scan every month. Alerts when violations appear.

From$49/mo

Free signup. Unsubscribe anytime.

Re-scan included

Verify your fixes — 1 free re-scan, valid for 90 days

Re-run the audit after deploying fixes to confirm each issue is resolved. Your re-scan coupon stays valid for 90 days and refreshes the full findings list, coverage matrix, and VPAT.

Your coupon
RESCAN-DEMO-2607-XK3M

Expires August 5, 2026

11 · Frequently asked

About this audit

Your audit

What does my 32/100 score mean?
32/100 · HIGH RISK
shop.example has significant accessibility barriers affecting blind, low-vision, and keyboard-only visitors and is at risk under ADA Title III.

Across 12 pages audited, shop.example returned 22 findings — [critical]6 critical[/critical], [serious]13 serious[/serious], and [moderate]3 moderate[/moderate] — with a score of [score]32 out of 100[/score]. The most frequent issues are 8 color-contrast failures, 6 unlabeled buttons, 5 unlabeled links, and 3 missing image alternatives. These four patterns alone account for all 22 findings and represent fundamental barriers to navigation and product discovery.
What are my top 3 priorities to fix first?
The three rules with the highest combined severity + occurrence count:
  1. Elements must meet minimum color contrast ratio thresholds — serious, 8 instances, ~5 min each.
  2. Buttons must have discernible text — critical, 6 instances, ~5 min each.
  3. Links must have discernible text — serious, 5 instances, ~5 min each.
How long will it take to fix all 22 issues?
Across 22 findings, 19 (6 critical, 13 serious) actively block assistive technology, and 3 (3 moderate, 0 minor) degrade the user experience without fully blocking. Most teams reach the low-risk band within 2-5 business days when prioritising critical-first.
Want it done for you? Our Bug-Fixing team implements every finding from this report and re-scans to verify — typically 5 business days, with a WCAG 2.2 AA certificate included. Book a free consultation →

Using this report

Can I share this report with my dev team or legal counsel?
Yes. Use the Share this report link in Section 06 above. Anyone with the URL can view the full premium report — no login required. Bookmark the URL or paste it into Slack, email, or your ticket tracker. The PDF download in the same section is also shareable as a self-contained file.
Is this PDF court-admissible or VPAT-ready?
The PDF documents your due-diligence trail: scan date, scope (pages, WCAG 2.2 AA criteria checked), methodology, and per-finding evidence with selector + code. Section 04 (WCAG 2.2 AA checklist) follows the VPAT 2.5 structure. This is technical evidence, not legal certification.

For B2B procurement or government contracts that require a signed VPAT 2.5 / ACR, pair this audit with a manual review and signed conformance statement — [email protected].
How long is this report accessible?
Indefinitely. Bookmark this page URL or the share link from Section 06 — both keep working as long as the audit data is in our database. The PDF download stays available from the same section; re-download any time after fixes to capture an updated snapshot.

What's next

How accurate is automated + AI scanning vs. a human audit?
Automated tools cover roughly 30-40% of WCAG criteria reliably (the rest require human judgement — context, intent, flow). The AI layer on top of this audit adds plain- English explanations, per-instance severity rationale, and litigation-risk framing — but it still works from the automated baseline.

For full conformance certification (VPAT / signed ACR), a manual review by an accessibility expert is required. Sites at 100+ pages or in regulated industries should pair this audit with a manual pass — write to [email protected] for Big-Site ($899) or custom Enterprise quotes.
My site has 100+ pages — what now?
The Big-Site Tier ($899) covers 51-100 pages with manual curation on top of the automated scan. Sites beyond 100 pages are handled as custom Enterprise quotes — turnaround typically 5-10 business days depending on scope. Write to [email protected] with your URL and any compliance deadline.
Can I re-scan my site after fixing?
Yes — your personal re-scan voucher is in the card directly above this FAQ. Click Jetzt einlösen(Redeem now), paste the code at checkout, and you’ll get a complete premium re-audit at no cost. The voucher is valid for 90 days and good for one full re-scan. Useful for verifying your fixes before a manual audit or compliance deadline.